华南地震

摘要:认识海洋水体中变化地磁场特征可更好地探索与研究海洋 ,进而保护海洋资源和环境。选取了布设在南海北部水下740 m､1829 m､2788 m和3788 m深处的四个海底地磁观测站地磁总场值所记录的数据,并收集整理了同时间段位于陆地的广东省肇庆地磁基准台和海南省琼中地磁基准台的观测数据;利用对比陆地和海洋中地磁观测记录在不同磁场环境下的同步观测记录的差异方法 ,分析不同水深环境下的观测记录与陆地之间差异及其主要影响因素。结果表明:在磁静时 ,变化地磁场海洋中地磁观测记录与陆地台站相比相差不大,而在变化地磁场比较活跃时 ,两者之间差异较大;在磁扰严重时间段中 ,水深越深的海陆台之间的差异则更明显;变化地磁场中的高频成分缺少会随水深加大而愈加得以突显。引起变化地磁场记录在海陆之间差异的主要因素是地球外界的变化地磁场与水体中的感应地磁场共同作用所致。

Understanding the characteristics of the variable geomagnetic field in ocean water can not only better explore and study the ocean, but also protect marine resources and environment. In this paper,the total geomagnetic field data of four submarine geomagnetic observatories located at depths of 740 m,1829 m,2788 m and 3788 m in the north of the South China Sea are selected, and the observation data of Zhaoqing geomagnetic reference station in Guangdong Province and Qiongzhong geomagnetic reference station in Hainan Province in the same time period are collected. Using the method of comparing the differences between the synchronous data of geomagnetic observation records on land and in the ocean under different magnetic conditions,the diversities between observation records in different water depths and on land and their main influencing factors were analyzed. The results show that the geomagnetic observation records in the ocean do not differ much from those of land stations when the variable geomagnetic field is calmer, and the difference gets obvious when the variable geomagnetic field is more active. During periods of severe magnetic disturbance, the differences are somewhat greater for deeper water depths. The absence of a high-frequency component in the variable geomagnetic field appears to be rising with increasing water depth. The main factor that causes the diversity in the variable geomagnetic field record between land and sea is due to the combination of the variable geomagnetic field outside the Earth and the induced geomagnetic field in the water column.

引言
1 数据来源
2 研究方法
3 分析和讨论
4 讨论
5 结语

图1 研究区内的海—陆地磁台站分布图<br/>Fig.1 Distribution map of sea-land magnetic stations in the study area

图1 研究区内的海—陆地磁台站分布图
Fig.1 Distribution map of sea-land magnetic stations in the study area

表1 陆地和海洋地磁观测台站的信息表<br/>Table 1 Information table of land and ocean geomagnetic observation stations

表1 陆地和海洋地磁观测台站的信息表
Table 1 Information table of land and ocean geomagnetic observation stations

图2 琼中台与四个海洋台在磁静日期间的观测曲线对比图<br/>Fig.2 Comparison of observation curves between Qiongzhong station and four ocean stations during magnetostatic period

图2 琼中台与四个海洋台在磁静日期间的观测曲线对比图
Fig.2 Comparison of observation curves between Qiongzhong station and four ocean stations during magnetostatic period

表2 四个海洋台在典型磁静日K指数<br/>Table 2 K index of four ocean stations on typical magnetostatic days

表2 四个海洋台在典型磁静日K指数
Table 2 K index of four ocean stations on typical magnetostatic days

表3 四个海洋台在典型磁扰日K指数<br/>Table 3 K index of four ocean stations on typical magnetic disturbance days

表3 四个海洋台在典型磁扰日K指数
Table 3 K index of four ocean stations on typical magnetic disturbance days

图3 琼中台与 T2和 T3台磁暴期间的观测曲线对比图<br/>Fig.3 Comparison of observation curves between the Qiongzhong station and T2 and T3 stations during magnetic storms

图3 琼中台与 T2和 T3台磁暴期间的观测曲线对比图
Fig.3 Comparison of observation curves between the Qiongzhong station and T2 and T3 stations during magnetic storms

图4 琼中台与 T1和 T4台磁暴期间的观测曲线对比图<br/>Fig.4 Comparison of observation curves between the Qiongzhong station and T1 and T4 stations during magnetic storms

图4 琼中台与 T1和 T4台磁暴期间的观测曲线对比图
Fig.4 Comparison of observation curves between the Qiongzhong station and T1 and T4 stations during magnetic storms

图5 典型台站的地磁场总场差值曲线<br/>Fig.5 The difference curve of total geomagnetic field of typical stations the

图5 典型台站的地磁场总场差值曲线
Fig.5 The difference curve of total geomagnetic field of typical stations the

[1] 王振东 ,王粲 ,袁洁浩 ,等 .中国及邻近地区地磁长期变化分析[J].地震研究 ,2009,42(1):103-111.
[2] HillM N , Mason C S. Diurnal variation of the earth’s magnetic field at sea[J]. nature.,1962(195): 365-366.
[3] White A. A sea floor magnetometer for the continental shelf[J]. Marine Geophysical Researches,1979,4(1): 105-114.
[4] Tomoda Y,Fujimoto H,Uchiyama A,et al. Ocean bottom proton magnetometer (design and test)[J]. Journal of Geomagnetism and Geoelectricity, 1981(33)335-339.
[5] 徐行 ,廖开训,盛堰.海底地磁日变观测站的设计与应用[J].海洋测绘,2005,25(1): 67-69.
[6] 张锡林 .海水层对地磁日变的影响[J].海洋测绘 , 2011,31(5): 21-23.
[7] 徐行 ,赵旭东 ,王功祥 ,等 ,南海西南次海盆深海地磁观测潜标的数据分析[J].地球物理学报,2017,60(3):1179-1188
[8] 王建军 ,李琪,杨冬梅 ,等 ,地磁活动K指数自动计算 FMI方法的改进[J],地球物理学报 ,2017,60(7):25342544
[9] Xu W Y. Introduction to geomagnetic activity (in Chinese)[M]. Beijing: Science Press,2014.
[10] 赵旭东 ,杨冬梅 ,何宇飞 ,等 . Sq等效电流在太阳活动周中的分析研究[J]. 地球物理学报 ,2014,57(11): 3777-3788.
[11] 陈幸莲 ,陆镜辉 ,徐行 ,等,广东阳江深井中的变化地磁场特征研究[J].华南地震,2019,39(4):53-59.
[12] 徐文耀.地球电磁现象物理学[M].合肥:中国科学技术大学出版社,2009.
[13] 杨诺夫斯基.地磁学[M],北京:地质出版社,1982.
[14] 邢琮琮 ,徐行 ,陆镜辉 ,等 ,南海北部陆海台站地磁观测与磁场模型计算的对比分析[J].华南地震,2019,39(4):60-68.

备注

引言

1 数据来源

2 研究方法

3 分析和讨论

4 讨论

5 结语

期刊信息