华南地震

运用常规波形､地电场日变幅各向异性度､差值法与渗流方位角法对不同时长四平台､长春台､榆树台､绥化台的地电场观测数据进行分析 ,结果显示 :各台能够记录到地震异常 ,其中榆树台､绥化台地电场在震前 6~10 d日变畸变明显。四个台地电场日变幅各向异性都存在超过 2倍均方差的 3~4个月的短期异常,其中长春台､榆树台､四平台相对明显。长春台 NS向与榆树台 EW向归零差值法分别存在 2个多月､ 1个多月的短期异常,绥化台归零差值法的异常偏弱 ,四平台部分时段受到干扰 ,应判定无异常。对于渗流方位角方法,四平台､榆树台与绥化台异常特征较明显 ,长春台异常相对较弱。各类分析方法存在一定的差异性,异常出现的早晚也各不相同,这与各台的电性条件､发震构造与各台构造关联性存在一定关系。

The paper analyzes the geoelectric field observation data of the Siping,Changchun,Yushu and Suihua stations by using conventional waveform,daily amplitude anisotropy of geoelectric field,difference method and seepage azimuth method for different durations. The results show that all stations can record seismic anomalies,and the geoelectric field of Yushu station and Suihua station have obvious daily distortion 6-10 days before the earthquake. The daily amplitude anisotropy of the four stations has a short-term anomaly of more than 2 times the mean square error for 3-4 months,and the abnormalities of the Changchun,Yushu and Siping stations are relatively obvious. There are short-term anomalies of more than 2 months or more than 1 month in the NS direction of Changchun station and EW direction of Yushu station. The abnormality of the method of zero return difference of Suihua station is weak. The Siping station was disturbed during part time,and there should be no abnormalities. For the seepage azimuth method,the anomaly characteristics of the Siping station,the Yushu station and the Suihua station are more obvious,and that of the Changchun station is relatively weak. There are certain differences between different methods,and the abnormal time is also different,which has a certain relationship with the electrical conditions of each station,the correlation between the seismogenic structure and each station structure.

引言
1 台站概况
2 观测资料基本情况及资料选取
3 异常分析
4 异常差异性分析
5 结论

图1 台站地质构造､布极示意图<br/>Fig.1 The schematic diagram of geological structure and arrangement of stations

图1 台站地质构造､布极示意图
Fig.1 The schematic diagram of geological structure and arrangement of stations

图2 2018年5月1-31日榆树台与绥化台地电场分钟值曲线<br/>Fig.2 The minute-value curves of geoeletric field at Yushu and Suihua stations from May 1st to May 31st , 2018

图2 2018年5月1-31日榆树台与绥化台地电场分钟值曲线
Fig.2 The minute-value curves of geoeletric field at Yushu and Suihua stations from May 1st to May 31st , 2018

图3 2018年5月1-31日新沂地电场分钟值曲线<br/>Fig.3 The minute-value curves of geoeletric field at Xinyi station from May1st to May 31st , 2018

图3 2018年5月1-31日新沂地电场分钟值曲线
Fig.3 The minute-value curves of geoeletric field at Xinyi station from May1st to May 31st , 2018

表1 2018年5月份不同时段地电场日变幅统计表<br/>Table 1 Statistics of daily variation of geoelectric field in different periods in May 2018

表1 2018年5月份不同时段地电场日变幅统计表
Table 1 Statistics of daily variation of geoelectric field in different periods in May 2018

图4 2018年1~6月地电场日变幅各向异性度曲线<br/>Fig.4 Anisotropy degree curve of daily amplitude of geoelectric field from January to June in 2018

图4 2018年1~6月地电场日变幅各向异性度曲线
Fig.4 Anisotropy degree curve of daily amplitude of geoelectric field from January to June in 2018

图5 2018年3~6月地电场小时值差值曲线<br/>Fig.5 The hour-value difference curves of geoeletric field from March to June in 2018

图5 2018年3~6月地电场小时值差值曲线
Fig.5 The hour-value difference curves of geoeletric field from March to June in 2018

表2 相关系数与差值统计表<br/>Table 2 The statistics of correlation coefficient and difference

表2 相关系数与差值统计表
Table 2 The statistics of correlation coefficient and difference

图6 2018年1~6月地电场α角变化曲线<br/>Fig.6 The α changing curves of geoeletric field from January to June in 2018

图6 2018年1~6月地电场α角变化曲线
Fig.6 The α changing curves of geoeletric field from January to June in 2018

[1] 黄清华,刘涛.新岛台地电场的潮汐响应与地震[J].地球物理学报,2006,49(6):1745-1754.
[2] 杜学彬 ,叶青 ,赵杰 ,等 .地电场日变化研究[J].地震,2007,27(增刊):121-130.
[3] 叶青,杜学彬,周克昌,等.大地电场变化的频谱特征[J].地震学报,2007,29(4):382-390.
[4] 谭大诚,赵家骝,席继楼,等.潮汐地电场特征及机理研究[J].地球物理学报,2010,53(3):544-555.
[5] 郭建芳,李非,张秀霞,等.地电场日变幅与地电暴分析[J].地震地磁观测与研究,2010,31(3):18-23.
[6] 范莹莹 ,杜学彬 ,Zotnichi J.汶川 Ms8.0大震前的电磁现象[J].地球物理学报,2010,253(12):2887-2898.
[7] 李飞 ,韩小飞 ,孙雷 ,等 .新沂台地电场与地磁场､连云港台体应变的日变化分析[J].地震研究,2011,34(4):457-465.
[8] 李飞,杜学彬,董淼 .新沂台和马陵山台地电场日变化及潮汐响应初步分析[J].地震学报,2017,39(4):565578.
[9] 崔腾发,杜学彬,叶青,等.中国大陆经纬链地电场日变化[J].地球物理学报,2013,56(7):2358-2368.
[10] 史红军,席继楼.吉林地区地电场变化特征分析研究[J].地震,2011,31(4):125-132.
[11] 孙雷 ,李飞,杨冯威 .新沂台地电场频谱特征的分析与研究[J].华南地震,2013,33(2):93-102.
[12]解滔 ,杜学彬,刘君 ,等汶川 MS8.0海地 MW7.0地震电磁信号小波能谱分析[J].地震学报 ,2013,35(1):6171.
[13] 毛桐恩,席继楼.地震过程中的大地电场变化特征[J].地球物理学报,1999,142(4):520-527.
[14] 沈红会 ,冯志生 ,燕明芝,等 .地电场震前变化的探讨[J].西北地震学报,2006,28(1):28-31.
[15] 马钦忠 .地电场多极距观测装置系统与文安 M5.1地震前首都圈地电场异常研究[J].地震学报,2008,30(6):615-625
[16] 田山 ,王建国,徐学恭 ,等.大地电场观测地震前兆异常提取技术研究[J].地震学报 ,2009,31(31):424431.
[17] 安张辉 ,元丽华 ,李宁 ,等.HHT方法在地电场数据处理中的应用[J].地球物理学进展 ,2010,25(2):525532.
[18] 刘君 ,杜学彬 ,JacquesZlotnicki,等 .几次大震前的地面和空间电磁场变化[J].地球物理学报,2011,54(11):2885-2897.
[19] 谭大诚 ,赵家骝 ,席继楼 ,等 .青藏高原中强地震前的地电场变异及构成解析[J].地球物理学报,2012,55(3):875-885.
[20] 章鑫 ,王丽 ,杜学彬 .大地电流研究进展与展望[J].地球科学进展,2016,31(7):708-717.
[21] 中国地震局 .GB/T 19531.2-2004地震台站观测环境技术要求第 2部分:电磁观测[S].北京 :中国标准出版社,2004.
[22] 中国地震局 .DB/T 18.2-2006地震台站建设规范地电台站第 2部分 :地电场台站[S].北京 :地震出版社,2006.
[23] 马铭志 ,李飞 ,李雪梅 .吉林四平､榆树台地电场与长春台地磁场､分量应变的变化分析[J].大地测量与地球动力学,2016,36(11):1114-1119.
[24] 赵和云 ,阮爱国 ,杨荣 ,等 .天祝大地电场异常与 1995年永登 5.8､1996年天祝 5.6级地震[J].西北地震学报,2002,24(1):36-40.
[25] 李飞 ,杜学彬,鲍海英 ,等.新沂台与马陵山台地电暴变化特征对比分析与讨论[J].地震,2018,38(4):8493.
[26] 谭大诚 ,席继楼 ,张慧 ,等 .地电场水文地质因素及裂隙水主体渗流方向逐日计算[J].地震学报,2013,35(1):64-69.
[27] 郭自强 ,周大庄 ,马福胜 ,等.岩石破裂中的电子发射[J].地球物理学报,1988,31(5):566-571.
[28] 邵博 ,沈军 ,于晓辉,等 .松原市扶余北隐伏活动断裂地震潜势研究[J].地震工程学报 ,2016,38(4):616623.
[29] 中国地震局科技监测司.地震地磁观测技术[M].北京:地震出版社,1995.

备注

引言

1 台站概况

2 观测资料基本情况及资料选取

3 异常分析

4 异常差异性分析

5 结论

期刊信息