[1]郭鹏程.基于离散元法的滑坡运动特征分析及风险研究[J].华南地震,2026,46(04):155-168.[doi:10.13512/j.hndz.2026.04.18]
　GUO Pengcheng.Motion Characteristics Analysis and Risk Study of Landslide Based on Discrete Element Method[J].,2026,46(04):155-168.[doi:10.13512/j.hndz.2026.04.18]
点击复制

基于离散元法的滑坡运动特征分析及风险研究()

华南地震[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
46
期数:
2026年04期
页码:
155-168
栏目:
地震与地质灾害
出版日期:
2026-07-09

文章信息/Info

Title:
Motion Characteristics Analysis and Risk Study of Landslide Based on Discrete Element Method
文章编号:
1001-8662（2026）04-0155-14
作者:
郭鹏程1; 2
1.中煤数字科技（广州）有限公司，广州 510451;2.中国煤炭地质总局航测遥感局，西安 710199
Author(s):
GUO Pengcheng1; 2
1.China Coal Digital Technology (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510451, China;2.Aerial Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Bureau, CNACG, Xian 710199, China
关键词:
滑坡; 运动过程; 颗粒流; 数值模拟; 风险分析
Keywords:
Landslide;  Movement process;  Particle flow;  Numerical simulation;  Risk analysis
分类号:
P642.22
DOI:
10.13512/j.hndz.2026.04.18
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为突破传统连续介质假设的局限，探究多场耦合作用下滑坡运动时空演化规律及能量转化路径，采用颗粒流数值模拟方法（PFC3D），通过正射影像建立滑坡三维模型，研究了卫生小区210国道内侧牵引式土质滑坡前缘因房屋切坡和雨水冲刷导致的逐渐向上扩展的运动现象。模拟过程中，生成了14083个0.3~0.5m的刚性球体模拟滑体物质，赋予标定的力学参数（Φ=14°，c=12kPa）进行滑坡运动过程的复现。结果表明：滑坡运动历时30s，平均峰值速度为3.67m/s，平均位移为35.2m；重力势能在滑坡过程中主要转化为摩擦耗能和动能，占比分别为86.8%和1.25%。此外，结合滑移距离和承灾体数据，进行滑坡的时空概率分布计算和易损性分析，为滑坡灾害的风险评估和防治措施提供了重要参考，为复杂人类活动影响区的滑坡成灾模式预测提供了理论支撑。
Abstract:
To overcome the limitations of the traditional continuum medium assumption and explore the spatio-temporal evolution laws and energy conversion paths of landslides under multi-field coupling, this paper employs the particle flow numerical simulation method (PFC3D) , establishes a three-dimensional model of the landslide based on orthophoto images, and studies the movement phenomenon of the front edge of the traction-type soil landslide on the inner side of the National Highway 210 in the Weisheng Community due to the gradual upward expansion of the house slope cutting and rainwater erosion. During the simulation process, 14 083 rigid spheres with diameters ranging from 0.3 m to 0.5 m were generated to simulate the sliding mass material, with the calibrated mechanical parameters (Φ=14°, c=12 kPa) assigned to reproduce the landslide movement process. The results indicate that the landslide movement lasted for 30 seconds, with the average peak velocity of 3.67 m/s, and the average displacement of 35.2 m. The gravitational potential energy is mainly converted into frictional energy dissipation and kinetic energy during the landslide process, accounting for 86.8% and 1.25% respectively.Furthermore, combining with the sliding distance and related hazard-bearing body data, spatio-temporal probability distribution calculations and vulnerability analyses of the landslide are conducted, which provides critical references for risk assessment and prevention measures against landslide disasters, and offers theoretical support for the prediction of landslide disaster formation patterns in areas influenced by complex human activities.

参考文献/References:

[1]李郎平,兰恒星.滑坡运动路径复杂度研究:综述与展望[J].地球科学,2021(2):1-23.
[2] Schaefer L N, Santi P M, Duron T C. Debris flow behavior during the September 2013 rainstorm event in the Colorado Front Range, USA[J]. Landslides, 2021(18): 1585-1595.
[3]陈兴,赵洲,魏江波,等.马边滑坡运动特征及冲击强度的数值研究[J].煤田地质与勘探,2021,49(4):234-241.
[4]张家勇,邹银先,杨大山.基于PFC3D的鱼鳅坡滑坡运动过程分析[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2021,32(4):33-39.
[5]孟桓羽,占洁伟,卢全中,等.陕西山阳“8.12”大型山体滑坡运动特征及数值模拟分析[J].工程地质学报,2021(6):1-18.
[6]杨海龙,樊晓一,裴向军.基于离散元法的偏转型滑坡运动堆积特征分析[J].长江科学院院报,2020,37(2):106-111,118.
[7] Lu C Y, Tang C L, Chan Y C, et al. Forecasting landslide hazard by the 3D discrete element method: A case study of the unstable slope in the Lushan hot spring district, central Taiwan[J]. Engineering Geology, 2014(183): 14-30.
[8]张龙,唐辉明,熊承仁,等.鸡尾山高速远程滑坡运动过程PFC3D模拟[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2012,31(S1):2601-2611.
[9] Poisel R, Preh A. 3D landslide run out modeling using the particle flow code PFC3D [M]. London: Taylor and Francis Group, 2008.
[10]梁承洋.川藏交通廊道冰碛物滑坡堵江风险及线路对策研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2015.
[11]李子隆,许模,赵勇,等.基于PFC2D的岸坡覆盖层失稳堵江模拟研究[J].水力发电,2018,44(1):27-30.
[12]李子隆,王浪.基于PFC2D的山区中小型水库滑坡堵江模拟研究[J].人民珠江,2019,40(3):123-127.
[13]吴剑.滑带剪切过程的离散元模拟研究[D].武汉:中国科学院研究生院(武汉岩土力学研究所),2007.
[14]张龙,唐辉明,熊承仁,等.鸡尾山高速远程滑坡运动过程PFC3D模拟[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2012,31(S1):2601-2611.
[15]施凤根.基于PFC3D的文家沟滑坡高速远程运动学特征研究[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2014.
[16]李冬冬.文家沟滑坡碎屑流动力特性分析[D].郑州:华北水利水电大学,2016.
[17]王畯才.滑坡—碎屑流堆积分布规律及其运动过程研究[D].合肥:合肥工业大学,2018.
[18]杜永彬.太大公路徐家寨滑坡运动的数值模拟[J].重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版),2008,27(6):1099-1102.
[19]王宇,李晓,王声星,等.滑坡渐进破坏运动过程的颗粒流仿真模拟[J].长江科学院院报,2012,29(12):46-52.
[20]胡江春,杨成林,徐晓晨,等.颗粒流法及其在库岸滑坡稳定分析中的应用[J].中原工学院学报,2016,27(4):61-64.
[21]赵洲,魏江波.基于颗粒流方法的堆积层滑坡运动过程模拟[J].煤田地质与勘探,2017,45(6):111-116.
[22]陈达,薛喜成,魏江波.基于PFC2D的刘涧滑坡破坏运动过程模拟[J].煤田地质与勘探,2018,46(4):115-121.
[23]闫晓娟,赵洲.金泉寺滑坡破坏机理及冲击强度定量分析[J].科学技术与工程,2019,19(22):76-84.
[24]汪华安,焦春茂,陈晓.基于颗粒流方法的滑坡机理数值分析[J].三峡大学学报(自然科学版),2020,42(1):47-51.
[25]郭延辉,杨溢,杨志全,等.国产GB-InSAR在特大型水库滑坡变形监测中的应用[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2021,32(2):66-72.
[26]易连兴.西南岩溶山区复合水动力场滑坡影响模式——以关岭县大寨滑坡为例[J].水文地质工程地质,2020,47 (4):43-50.
[27]高杨,贺凯,李壮,等.西南岩溶山区特大滑坡成灾类型及动力学分析[J].水文地质工程地质,2020,47(4):14-23.
[28]智斌.基于PFC3D的土体渗透破坏数值模拟[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2017.
[29]毕明树,王维,徐琴琴,等.工程热力学[M].北京:化学工业出版社:202407.300.
[30]刘福臻,王灵,肖东升,等.基于模糊综合评判法的宁南县滑坡易发性评价[J].自然灾害学报,2021,30(5):237-246.
[31]卢坤林.基于极限平衡理论的土质边坡空间效应研究及应用[D].合肥:合肥工业大学,2014.
[32]凌云.区域滑坡灾害风险分析的模糊评价方法研究[D].北京:华北电力大学,2013.
[33]李红英,谭跃虎.滑坡灾害风险可接受准则计算模型研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2013,9(S2):2047-2052.

相似文献/References:

[1]段中满,贾亮亮,蒋明光,等.基于不同特征选择方法和随机森林法的滑坡易发性评价——以湖南中西部地区为例[J].华南地震,2023,(02):115.[doi:10.13512/j.hndz.2023.02.13]
　DUAN Zhongman,JIA Liangliang,JIANG Mingguang,et al.Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Based on Different Feature Selection Methods and Random Forest Method—a Case Study of Central and Western Hunan[J].,2023,(04):115.[doi:10.13512/j.hndz.2023.02.13]
[2]邱慧玲,龙文华,卿展晖.模糊数学在滑坡治理工程后评价中的应用[J].华南地震,2023,(04):75.[doi:10.13512/j.hndz.2023.04.10]
　QIU Huiling,LONG Wenhua,QING Zhanhui.Application of Fuzzy Mathematics in Post-evaluation of Landslide Treatment Project[J].,2023,(04):75.[doi:10.13512/j.hndz.2023.04.10]
[3]李 圣,卿元华,庄儒新,等.考虑历史地震烈度的楚雄州滑坡发育特征分析[J].华南地震,2024,(02):52.[doi:10.13512/j.hndz.2024.02.07]
　LI Sheng,QING Yuanhua,ZHUANG Ruxin,et al.Analysis of Landslide Development Characteristics in Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture Considering Historical Earthquake Intensity[J].,2024,(04):52.[doi:10.13512/j.hndz.2024.02.07]
[4]张 伟,梁 柱,郑志文.广东省不同尺度下地质灾害易发性评价指标与方法[J].华南地震,2026,46(04):133.[doi:10.13512/j.hndz.2026.04.16]
　ZHANG Wei,LIANG Zhu,ZHENG Zhiwen.Research on Evaluation Indexes and Methods of Geological Hazards Susceptibility at Different Scales in Guangdong Province[J].,2026,46(04):133.[doi:10.13512/j.hndz.2026.04.16]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2025-11-01
作者简介：郭鹏程（1984-），男，硕士研究生，研究方向为工程地质与矿产地质。E-mail: guo342@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2026-07-20