[1]熊成,叶秀薇,张严心.广东测震台站的场地响应以及对震级确定的影响分析[J].华南地震,2020,40(04):18-28.[doi:10.13512/j.hndz.2020.04.03]
　XIONG Cheng,YE Xiuwei,ZHANG Yanxin.Site Response of Guangdong Seismic Stations and Its Influence on Determination of Earthquake Magnitude[J].,2020,40(04):18-28.[doi:10.13512/j.hndz.2020.04.03]
点击复制

广东测震台站的场地响应以及对震级确定的影响分析()
分享到：

华南地震[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
40
期数:
2020年04期
页码:
18-28
栏目:
地震研究
出版日期:
2020-12-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Site Response of Guangdong Seismic Stations and Its Influence on Determination of Earthquake Magnitude
文章编号:
1001-8662（2020）04-0018-011
作者:
熊成1; 2; 3; 叶秀薇1; 2; 3; 张严心1; 2; 3
1.广东省地震局, 广州 510070;2.中国地震局地震监测与减灾技术重点实验室,广州 510070;3.广东省地震局广东省地震预警与重大工程安全诊断重点实验室,广州 510070
Author(s):
XIONG Cheng1; 1; 2; 1; 3; YE Xiuwei1; 1; 2; 1; 3; ZHANG Yanxin1; 1; 2; 1; 3
1.Guangdong Earthquake Agency,Guangzhou 510070,China;2.CEA Key Laboratory of Earthquake Monitoring and Disaster Mitigation Technology, Guangdong Earthquake Agency,Guangzhou 510070,China;3.Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Earthquake Early Warning and Safety Diagnosis of Major Projects,Guangdong Earthquake Agency,Guangzhou 510070,China
关键词:
广东地震台网; H/V谱比法; 场地响应; 震级校正
Keywords:
Guangdong Digital Seismic Network; H/V spectral ratio method; Site response; Magnitude deviation
分类号:
P315.32
DOI:
10.13512/j.hndz.2020.04.03
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
认识台站场地响应对提高台网产出数据的准确性具有重要的意义。分析了广东台网72个测震台站的地脉动记录数据,利用谱比法计算得到各台站0.1~20Hz的场地响应。结果表明有32个台站场地响应曲线平缓,无明显频率放大点;有32个台站的场地响应曲线在部分频率范围表现出较高值;还有4个台站场地响应曲线表现轻微场地缩小作用和4个台站场地响应曲线呈起伏剧烈的形态。综合台基岩性分析,发现台站的基岩硬度越大、结构越致密,场地放大作用越小。进一步利用2011年1月至2019年10月广东台网记录到的852次地震事件（ML≥2）,分析了台站场地响应对单台震级的影响,结果发现大部分台站的震级偏差结果与场地响应具有一定关系,考虑场地响应的单台震级校正值能够在一定程度上减小单台震级偏差,提高单台震级的准确性。
Abstract:
Researching the site response of the stations is of great significance to improve the accuracy of the output data of the seismic network. The paper processed the microtremors noise data recorded by 72 stations of Guangdong Seismic Network,and calculated the site response of each station at 0.1-20 Hz based on horizontal-to-vertical (H/V) spectral ratio method. The results show that the site response curves of 32 stations are flat,and there were no obvious frequency amplification points. The site response curves of 32 stations showed higher values in some frequency ranges. In addition,there were 4 stations showing slight site reduction and 4 stations with sharply fluctuating response curves. Based on comprehensive lithology analysis of the platform,it is found that the greater the hardness of the bedrock and the denser the structure,the smaller the site amplification effect. This paper further uses the 852 earthquake events with ML ≥2 recorded by the Guangdong Station Network from January 2011 to October 2019 to analyze the effect of the station site response on the magnitude of a single station. As a result, the magnitude deviation of most stations has a certain relationship with the site response. The single magnitude correction value obtained from the site response can reduce the deviation between the single magnitude and the average magnitude of the network to a certain extent and improve the accuracy of the single station magnitude

参考文献/References:

[1]Rogers,A.M.,J.C.Tinsley,W.W.Hays,etal.Evaluationoftherelationbetweennear-surfacegeologicalunitsandgroundresponseinthevicinityofLongBeach,California[J].BulletinoftheSeismologicalSocietyofAmerica,1979,5(69).
[2]AndrewsDJ.ObjectiveDeterminationofSourceParametersandSimilarityofEarthquakesofDifferentSize[M].Washington,D.C:AmericanGeophysicalUnion,1986:259-267.
[3]Borcherdt,R..EffectsoflocalgeologyongroundmotionnearSanFranciscoBay[J].BulletinoftheSeismologicalSocietyofAMERICA,1970,1(60):29-61.
[4]Moya,A..InversionofSourceParametersandSiteEffectsfromStrongGroundMotionRecordsusingGeneticAlgorithms[J].2000,90(4):977-992.
[5]Nakamura,Y..Amethodfordynamiccharacteristicsestimationofsubsurfaceusingmicrotremoronthegroundsurface[J].RailwayTechnicalResearchInstitute,QuarterlyReports,1989,1(30):25-33.
[6]刘特培,杨向东,万永芳.广东及邻区地震活动特征及近期地震危险性分析[J].华南地震,2003,23(3):35-40.
[7]任镇寰,罗振暖,秦乃岗.华南地震区地震活动基本特征与地震大形势再研究[J].华南地震,1998(01):41-50.
[8]曹敬贺,孙金龙,徐辉龙,等.珠江口海域滨海断裂带的地震学特征[J].地球物理学报,2014,57(02):498-508.
[9]熊成,曹敬贺,孙金龙,等.珠江口外海域滨海断裂带沿构造走向的变化特征[J].地球科学,2018,43(10):3682-3697.
[10]黄玉龙,郑斯华,刘杰,等.广东地区地震动衰减和场地响应的研究[J].地球物理学报,2003(01):54-61.
[11]华卫,陈章立,郑斯华.利用不同方法估算流动台站的场地响应[J].地震,2010,30(03):30-44.
[12]Bao,F.,Z.Li,D.A.Yuen,etal.ShallowstructureoftheTangshanfaultzoneunveiledbydenseseismicarrayandhorizontal-to-verticalspectralratiomethod[J].PhysicsoftheEarthandPlanetaryInteriors,2018,281:46-54.
[13]Sánchez-Sesma,F.J.,M.RodríguezU.Iturrarán-Viveros,etal.AtheoryformicrotremorH/Vspectralratio:applicationforalayeredmedium[J].GeophysicalJournalInternational,2018,186(1):221-225.
[14]冀昆.基于H/V谱比法的场地特征研究[D].哈尔滨：中国地震局工程力学研究所,2014.
[15]陈棋福,刘澜波,王伟君,等.利用地脉动探测北京城区的地震动场地响应[J].科学通报,2008(18):2229-2235.
[16]许亚吉,杨晶琼,蔡明军,等.云南测震台网台站场地响应与ML震级测定的讨论[J].中国地震,2019,35(01):84-95.
[17]张红才,徐嘉隽,陈智勇.基于噪声谱比法的福建台网观测台站的场地响应研究[J].地震学报,2015,37(06):1045-1058.
[18]Lesparre,N.,F.Boudin,C.Champollion,etal.NewinsightsonfracturesdeformationfromtiltmeterdatameasuredinsidetheFontainedeVauclusekarstsystem[J].GeophysicalJournalInternational,2017,208(3):1389-1402.
[19]温瑞智,冀昆,任叶飞,等.基于谱比法的我国强震台站场地分类[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2015,34(06):1236-1241.
[20]Konno,K.,T.Ohmachi.Ground-MotionCharacteristicsEstimatedfromSpectralRatiobetweenHorizontalandVerticalComponentsofMicrotremor[J].BulletinoftheSeismologicalSocietyofAmerica,1998,1(88):228-241.
[21]中国地震局.地震及前兆数字观测技术规范（地震观测）,北京:地震出版社,2001.
[22]陈培善,秦嘉政.量规函数、台站方位、台基及不同测量方法对近震震级ML的影响[J].地震学报,1983(01):87-98.
[23]陈贵美,胡文灼,刘军.广东数字遥测地震台网台站震级偏差的研究[J].华南地震,2010,30(S1):113-121.

相似文献/References:

[1]林庆西,梁明,杨选,等.广东地震台网水平定位能力评估[J].华南地震,2020,40(04):49.[doi:10.13512/j.hndz.2020.04.07]
　LIN Qingxi,LIANG Ming,YANG Xuan,et al.The Estimation of Horizontal Location Ability for Guangdong Seismic Network[J].,2020,40(04):49.[doi:10.13512/j.hndz.2020.04.07]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期: 2020-02-10
基金项目: 国家自然基金广东联和基金项目（U1901602）；广东省科技计划项目（2018B020207011）联合资助
作者简介:熊成（1993- ）,男,助理工程师,主要从事地震监测及地壳结构成像研究。
E-mail: xiongcheng15@mails.ucas.ac.cn.
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-12-20