[1]王力伟,王小娜,吴国瑞,等.2018年3月20日阳江新湖水库ML 4.2级震群发震机理分析[J].华南地震,2018,38(增刊):1-8.[doi:10.13512/j.hndz.2018.S1.001]
　WANG Liwei,WANG Xiaona,WU Guorui,et al.Seismological Mechanism Analysis of ML4.2 Earthquake Swarm on March 20th in Xinhu Reservoir，Yangjiang[J].,2018,38(增刊):1-8.[doi:10.13512/j.hndz.2018.S1.001]
点击复制

2018年3月20日阳江新湖水库ML 4.2级震群发震机理分析()
分享到：

华南地震[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
38
期数:
2018年增刊
页码:
1-8
栏目:
华南地震
出版日期:
2018-10-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Seismological Mechanism Analysis of ML4.2 Earthquake Swarm on March 20th in Xinhu Reservoir，Yangjiang
文章编号:
1001-8662（2018）S1-001-09
作者:
王力伟1; 2; 王小娜2; 吴国瑞2; 黄柳芳
1. 中国地震局地球物理研究所中国地震局地震观测与地球物理成像重点实验室，北京 100081；
2. 广东省地震局，广州 510070
Author(s):
WANG Liwei1; 2; WANG Xiaona2; WU Guorui2; HUANG Liufang2
1. Key Laboratory of Seismic Observation and Geophysical Imaging，Institute of Geophysics，China Earthquake Administration，Beijing 100081，China；
2. Guangdong Earthquake Agency，Guangzhou 510070，China
关键词:
新湖震群; 震源机制; 双差定位; 库仑应力
Keywords:
XinHu earthquake swarm; Focal mechanism; Double difference relocation; Coulomb stress change
分类号:
P315.33
DOI:
10.13512/j.hndz.2018.S1.001
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
2018年3月20日，阳江新湖水库发生了ML 4.2级震群活动。为研究该次震群的发震构造及机理，采用CAP、初动及振幅比方法反演了3次ML 3.0级以上地震的震源机制，采用双差定位方法对震群序列进行了重新定位，并计算了这3次地震之间的静态库仑应力触发效应。结果表明：主震震源机制为走向311°、倾角65°、滑动角-61°，破裂性质为正断兼左旋走滑，震源破裂类型与余震空间展布符合较好，且与NW向左旋正断型的洋边海断裂相吻合。该次震群活动是洋边海断裂北延线在区域构造应力场作用下破裂的结果。静态库仑应力计算结果显示：3次地震之间应力触发效应明显，2018年2月18日ML 3.2级地震触发了2018年3月17日ML 3.5级地震，这两次地震又联合显著触发了2018年3月20日ML 4.2级地震。
Abstract:
On the March 20th，2018，a significant ML 4.2 earthquake swarm occurred in Xinhu reservoir,YangJiang. To systematically analyze the seismological mechanism of this swarm，the paper firstly inversed the focal mechanisms of three earthquakes with ML≥3.0 by using CAP method and polarity and SV/P amplitude ratio method. Secondly，the paper relocated the sequence by using HypoDD method. At last，in order to study earthquake triggering effect in thisswarm，the paper calculated static coulomb stress triggering effect between these three earthquakes with ML≥3.0. The result shows：the ML 4.2 main shock is a significant normal fault with small left lateral components，which has a strike 311°，dip 65°and rake -61°.Considering the well agreement of this focal mechanism among with the relocated earthquake distributionand the Yangbian sea active fault，the paper suggests that this ML 4.2 earthquake swarm is fractured on northwest extension of Yangbian sea active fault guided by reginal tectonic stress. The static coulomb stress change among these three earthquakes show that these three earthquakes have been triggered by each other. The ML 3.5 earthquake on March 17th，2018 has been triggered by the ML 3.2 earthquake on February 18th by 0.016 Bar， and The ML 4.2 earthquake on March 20th has been significantly triggered by the two former events by 0.119 Bar.

相似文献/References:

[1]马晓静,吕作勇,姜喜姣.多种方法测定广东阳西3.7级地震震源深度[J].华南地震,2019,39(02):19.[doi:10.13512/j.hndz.2019.02.004]
　MA Xiaojing,LYU Zuoyong,JIANG Xijiao.Focal Depth Determination of the Yangxi M3.7 Earthquake in Guangdong by Multiple Methods[J].,2019,39(增刊):19.[doi:10.13512/j.hndz.2019.02.004]
[2]陈大庆,杨 雪.1987年江西寻乌5.4级地震及1994年台湾 海峡7.3级地震前中小地震活动图像特征[J].华南地震,2019,39(增刊):78.[doi:10.13512/j.hndz.2019.S1.013]
　CHEN Daqing,YANG Xue.Images Characteristics of Seismic Activity before 1987 Xunwu M 5.4 Earthquake in Jiangxi Province and 1994 Taiwan Strait M 7.3 Earthquake[J].,2019,39(增刊):78.[doi:10.13512/j.hndz.2019.S1.013]
[3]李 娟,徐 岩,韩晓明,等.2013年科左后旗5.3级地震前后的P轴转向和应力场变化分析[J].华南地震,2019,39(增刊):97.[doi:10.13512/j.hndz.2019.S1.016]
　LI Juan,XU Yan,HAN Xiaoming,et al.P-axis Turning Phenomenon and Stress Field Change before and after the Kezuohouqi M 5.3 Earthquake in 2013[J].,2019,39(增刊):97.[doi:10.13512/j.hndz.2019.S1.016]

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-12-05