[1]马晓静,吕作勇,姜喜姣.多种方法测定广东阳西3.7级地震震源深度[J].华南地震,2019,39(02):19-25.[doi:10.13512/j.hndz.2019.02.004]
　MA Xiaojing,LYU Zuoyong,JIANG Xijiao.Focal Depth Determination of the Yangxi M3.7 Earthquake in Guangdong by Multiple Methods[J].,2019,39(02):19-25.[doi:10.13512/j.hndz.2019.02.004]
点击复制

多种方法测定广东阳西3.7级地震震源深度()
分享到：

华南地震[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
39
期数:
2019年02期
页码:
19-25
栏目:
华南地震
出版日期:
2019-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Focal Depth Determination of the Yangxi M3.7 Earthquake in Guangdong by Multiple Methods
作者:
马晓静1; 2; 3; 吕作勇1; 2; 3; 姜喜姣1; 2; 3
1. 广东省地震局，广州 510070；2. 中国地震局地震监测与减灾技术重点实验室，广州 510070；
3. 广东省地震预警与重大工程安全诊断重点实验室（筹），广州 510070
Author(s):
MA Xiaojing1; 2; 3; LYU Zuoyong1; 2; 3; JIANG Xijiao1; 2; 3
1. Guangdong Earthquake Agency，Guangzhou 510070，China；2. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Monitoring and Disaster Mitigation Technology，China Earthquake Administration，Guangzhou 510070，China；3. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Early Warning and Safety Diagnosis of Major Project，Guangzhou 510070，China
关键词:
震源深度; 震源机制; CAP; sPL; sPn; sPmP; 深度震相
Keywords:
Focal depth; Focal mechanism; CAP; sPL; sPn; sPmP; Depth phase
DOI:
10.13512/j.hndz.2019.02.004
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
应用CAP和深度震相方法，对2018年3月20日发生在广东阳西的M 3.7级地震震源深度进行了测定。首先通过CAP方法反演获得震源机制解，拟合最佳震源深度为12 km。然后在震中距100 km以内的近台识别出清晰的sPL和PmP、sPmP震相，利用频率-波数（F-K）方法，计算出深度震相在不同深度下的理论地震图，与实际观测波形对比测定震源深度为12 km。再利用250~400 km震中距范围内台站上识别出的sPn与Pn震相的走时差，测得震源深度12.6 km。多种方法的研究结果一致，表明该地震震源深度为12 km比较可靠。
Abstract:
By using CAP and depth phase method，the focal depth of the M 3.7 earthquake happened on March 20th，2018 in Yangxi of Guangdong Province was determined. Firstly，the focal mechanism solution is inverted by CAP，and the optimal focal depth is got as 12 km. Then the sPL，PmP and sPmP phases are identified clearly at near stations of epicenter distance within 100 km. By using frequency-wavenumber（F-K）method，theoretical seismograms of deep phases at different depths are calculated，and the focal depth is determined as 12 km after compared with the actual observed waveforms. Meanwhile，according to the travel time difference between sPn and Pn phases identified on the stations within the epicenter distance of 250-400 km，the focal depth is measured as 12.6 km. The consistency of the results obtained from several methods indicates that the focal depth of 12 km for this earthquake is a reliable result.

相似文献/References:

[1]王力伟,王小娜,吴国瑞,等.2018年3月20日阳江新湖水库ML 4.2级震群发震机理分析[J].华南地震,2018,38(增刊):1.[doi:10.13512/j.hndz.2018.S1.001]
　WANG Liwei,WANG Xiaona,WU Guorui,et al.Seismological Mechanism Analysis of ML4.2 Earthquake Swarm on March 20th in Xinhu Reservoir，Yangjiang[J].,2018,38(02):1.[doi:10.13512/j.hndz.2018.S1.001]
[2]陈大庆,杨 雪.1987年江西寻乌5.4级地震及1994年台湾 海峡7.3级地震前中小地震活动图像特征[J].华南地震,2019,39(增刊):78.[doi:10.13512/j.hndz.2019.S1.013]
　CHEN Daqing,YANG Xue.Images Characteristics of Seismic Activity before 1987 Xunwu M 5.4 Earthquake in Jiangxi Province and 1994 Taiwan Strait M 7.3 Earthquake[J].,2019,39(02):78.[doi:10.13512/j.hndz.2019.S1.013]
[3]李 娟,徐 岩,韩晓明,等.2013年科左后旗5.3级地震前后的P轴转向和应力场变化分析[J].华南地震,2019,39(增刊):97.[doi:10.13512/j.hndz.2019.S1.016]
　LI Juan,XU Yan,HAN Xiaoming,et al.P-axis Turning Phenomenon and Stress Field Change before and after the Kezuohouqi M 5.3 Earthquake in 2013[J].,2019,39(02):97.[doi:10.13512/j.hndz.2019.S1.016]

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-07-04